1. Ibid.
2. Ibid., p.168
3. HMC, Salisbury MSS, xvi. 50
4. PRO, SP 14/4/27; Memorials of Affairs of State in the Reigns of Queen Elizabeth and King James...from the Original Papers of ...Sir Ralph Winwood (London, 1725), ii. 18-19.  In putting the best construction on the case Cecil did not tell the King's ambassadors the whole truth about it.  He said that the sheriff had certified Goodwin an outlaw, without mentioning that he had been instructed to do so, and made it appear that the Commons had based their case largely on Goodwin's exemption by a general pardon, without mentioning their main contention that Goodwin had never been outlawed in the first place.  Cecil also credited the settlement to the King's wisdom, without mentioning that the King had little choice and without mentioning the Common's willingness to accept less than they had established a claim to.
5. CJ, i. 939
6. Ibid., p. 209
7. Munden, 'James I and "the Growth of Mutual Distrust"', p. 57