Without detracting from the honesty, dedication and zeal of the first generation of American missionaries who brought American ways and the Protestant outlook to the Middle East, one might well observe, from the hindsight of the late twentieth century, that the founding of American colleges in the Middle East in the 1860's, reflected the new secular trend in American life at home. The colleges also came to symbolize the best of the American Enlightenment and American Liberalism which had been transferred to the Middle East. It is interesting to note, however, that the colleges, even though they operated under the control of secular boards and were chartered in New York State, were, for the first hundred years, largely guided by men possessing that fundamental integrity of the early missionaries. Moreover, the success of the colleges depended upon the calibre of their students, many of whom had completed their training in the numerous preparatory schools operated by missionaries. The point here seems to be this: at a time when religious consciousness, Muslim, Christian or Jewish, was at a low ebb in the Middle East, the integrity, optimism and good will of literally God-fearing people, however insufferable their American self-righteousness may have been, made an important contribution to the developing liberal outlook and educational institutions of the Middle East. Belief in a remote, but powerful and loving God appeared to produce more stable leadership and social institutions than no beliefs at all. Also the painful nurturing of Western-style intellectuals among the Muslims, Christians and Jews of the Middle East often received impetus and encouragement from the influx of well-informed, if religiously-biased, Americans.
A change began to take place between the old and the new missionary after the Civil War. Howard Bliss, son of Daniel Bliss the founder and second president of Syrian Protestant College (later, American University of Beirut) explained the end result at the turn of the century: he observed that the 'modem' missionary believed in the uniqueness of Christ's message but believed also that knowledge of God's truth may be acquired through other channels, thus he was more tolerant of other faiths than were his predecessors. The new missionary looked upon the Bible as a vital, but not errorless, spiritual document (a clear reflection of the impact of Darwinism). He reflected Christ's love and joy, his call for obedience to God and the hope Christ brings for salvation amid tragedy and sin. In short, the missionary, by the twentieth century, paralleling the drift in American society, had evolved from the stem Calvinist of the early nineteenth century to a more tolerant individual who attempted to bring individuals peacefully to Christ... "with or without a resulting change in his ecclesiastical affiliation."
The lives and contributions of the first presidents of the two major American Colleges in the Middle East, Cyrus Hamlin of Robert College and Daniel Bliss of Syrian Protestant College, provide insight into the uniqueness the foibles of the American impact on the Middle East in the nineteenth century.
1. Cyrus Hamlin and the Founding of Robert College
Cyrus Hamlin traced his ancestry to French Huguenots. His grandfather and his father, Hannibal, together with his uncles, had distinguished themselves in the Revolution and hence received farms at Waterford when Maine was still a territory. Hamlin was born on January 5, 1811. Reminiscent of the description of David Green (Ben Gurion) as a boy, Hamlin was "weakly" and his head was "too big." Shortly after the birth of Cyrus, his father died leaving his mother to rear four children on a newly-cleared farm. Young Cyrus, destined for the life of a farmer, had this plan interrupted by the family doctor who observed, "[Cyrus] has not grown for three years, farm work will kill him. Give him an education." But therewas no money, so that young Cyrus at age sixteen was apprenticed to his brother-in-law to become a silversmith and jeweler in Portland. A born mechanical genius, Hamlin quickly mastered his trade. After winning an essay contest at the evening school for apprentices, he was challenged by his pastor to study for the ministry. Cyrus pleaded lack of funds, but his church staked him $1,000, enough to launch him on a new career with preparation at Bridgeton Academy, Bowdoin College and Bangor Seminary. At Bowdoin he distinguished himselelf, rising to the head of the class of 1834. Apart from his great religious fervor and dedication, he made a name for himself by constructing the first steam engine ever assembled in Maine. Thus, already in his college days, Hamlin exhibited a unique combination of devoutness, physical strength, mechanical genius and all round scholarship which would serve him so well in Istanbul. Soon he was eaming his expenses as a lecturer on both religious and mechanical themes at the Lyceum. His physical courage also survived many tests: with college bullies, whom he took to court, and with an Irish riot, which he quelled with his native eloquence. Graduating from Bowdoin College in 1834 and from the Seminary in 1837, he prepared to go to China but was assigned instead to Turkey by the Protestant Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions. The U. S. financial crisis of 1837 forced a postponement, but eventually he received his "instructions" on December 2, 1838 and sailed for Smyrna (Izmir) the following day. Hamlin, always a keen observer, noted in passing that Greek shipowners in the "thirties" found it difficult to obtain marine insurance because so many of their vessels were losf to obtain the insurance money. After a rough passage that kept his wife bedridden most of the voyage, Hamlin reached Smyrna on January 17, 1839 after a month and a half at sea!
To dispel any idea that missionaries, taking up posts in major Ottoman cities, suffered discomforts of the sort experienced in Africa or China, we should perhaps pause here to note first that the Ottoman Empire, although on the wane during this period, still maintained impressive resources and cities. The countryside, however, had fallen into decay and neglect, and one might occasionally face real peril from highwaymen, fanatic holy men or ignorant officials. The account of Smyrna in the 1831's from the pen of John L. Stephens is among the best. Stephens visited Smyrna and Constantinople (Istanbul) in April and May of 1835, about three and one half years before the Hamlins. Stephens had first visited Greece, both the classical ruins and the ruins from the recent War of Independence which had been followed closely and sympathetically in America.
Upon reaching the shore of Asia Minor, Stephens first visited a Turkish bath in Smyrna, "Oh, these Turks are luxurious dogs. Chibouks (a long 'Dutch style' clay pipe), coffee, hot baths and as many wives as they please." Thereupon he took a stroll on the main street and observed:
Paris on a fete day does not present so gay and animated a scene... Franks, Jews, Greeks, Turks, and Armenians, in their various and striking costumes, were mingled together in agreeable confusion; and making all due allowance for the circumstance that I had long been debarred the sight of an unveiled woman, I certainly never saw so much beauty.... There is something remarkable in the tenacity with which the Grecian women have sustained the rights and prerogatives of beauty in defiance of Turkish customs and prejudices....
After the beauty in the streets, Stephens reminds us of more practical maws: "But I need not attempt to interest you [his correspondent] in Smyrna,... every Cape Cod sailor knows it better than I do." Noting that Izmir is considered "Infidel" by the Turk, the young traveler calls attention to the handsome houses occupied by the various foreign consuls and the rich. "... At Smyrna they [the consuls] are far more important than ambassadors and ministers at the European capitals; and, with their janissaires [sic.: actually at this time gendarmerie and their appearance on all public occasions in uniform, are looked upon by the Levantines somewhat like the consuls sent abroad under the Roman empire, and by the Turks as almost sultans."s As was the custom of the day, Stephens delivered letters of introduction to Mr. Offley, the American consul, who had resided in Smyrna for thirty years. Stephens was quite impressed by the beauty of the Reverend Brewer's wife. "... There is something exceedingly interesting in a missionary's wife," he writes. "She who had been cherished as a plant that winds must not breathe on too rudely, recovers from the shock of a separation from her friends to find herself in a land of barbarians... [but] the tender helpless girl changes her very nature, and becomes the staff and support of the man."
We have also some keen observations of the business community, "Socity in Smyrna is purely mercantile.... Sometimes lounging in a merchant's counting room, I took up an American paper, and heard Boston, and New York, and Baltimore, and cotton, and opium, and freight .." As to the night life, the local 'aristocracy' took care of their needs at the Casino :
Every stranger, upon his arrival in Smyrna, is introduced at the Casino. I went there the first time to a concert. It is a large building, erected by a club of merchants, with a suite of rooms on the lower floor, billiards, cards, reading and sitting room, and a ballroom above covering the whole ....
But to Stephen's dismay, they... "excluded the Greek and Smyrniote women, among whom is found a great portion of the beauty of the place." Stephens also visited the well-to-do 'Franks' or Europeans in their summer houses located in outlying villages. "The whole region of country around their villages is beautiful in landscape and scenery, producing the choicest flowers and fruits; the fig-tree particularly growing with a luxuriance unknown in any other part of the world."
Taking ship for Istanbul on the steamer Maria Dorothea, Stephens devotes a number of pages in support of the new atmosphere in Turkey resulting from the reforming zeal of Sultan Mahmud Il (1808-1839):
A few years since it would have been at peril of a man's life to appear in many parts of Turkey in a European dress; but the European is looked upon, not only as a creature fit to live, but as a man to be respected. The Sultan himself, the great head of the nation and the religion, the viceregent of God upon earth, has taken off the turban, and all the officers of government have followed his example.
Stephens also makes some rather penetrating comments about the Sultan's
own countrymen; "Time was when the word of a Turk was as sacred as
a precept of the Koran; now he can no more be relied upon than a Jew or
a Christian." This young American traveler attributes the change in
the Turks to the advent of steam navigation, his argument being that until
the steamship made its appearance, "the Turks were proud as peacocks
and had... but little opportunity of making comparison, and consequently,
again, but little means of discovering their own inferiority. "
Stephens at first did not like Istanbul. Filled with stories of plague, beggars and filth, he found supporting evidence: "A lazy, lounging, and filthy population; beggars baking in the sun and dogs licking their sores: streets never cleaned but by the winds and rains. ... Tombstones at the corners of the streets...." He talks with his banker, a Mr. Churchill, who later was publicly bastinadoed for accidentally shooting a Turkish boy. One wonders at Stephens' own ethics when he comments, "... Besides the physical pain, there was a sense of the indignity (of punishment for the European) that aroused every feeling. (There was no mention of the lad who was shot and whether he survived?) Here we have bubbling through Stephens' account that tiresome American and European attitude of superiority over the "natives."
On the missionary scene in Istanbul, this was the era of the William Goodells and the Harrison G.O. Dwights. Dwight and Eli Smith, dressed as Turks, had made a daring survey of the Christian communities in the Eastern provinces of the Ottoman Empire and Western Persia in 1830. Goodell had been sent to Istanbul by the Mission Board in 1831, shortly before the U.S.-Ottoman Treaty was ratified. In 1832 the Dwights had joined the Goodells. It was Dwight who took Stephens out to visit the redoubtable Commodore David Porter, the first American charge- d'affaires accredited to the Porte after the Commercial Treaty had been signed. Porter had seen action against the French in 1798-1799 and had later commanded the Enterprise in the Tripoli War. While later serving on the Philadelphia, he was captured and suffered a term of imprisonment in Tripoli. He had distinguished himself in the War of 1812, once more being captured by the British at Valparaiso, Chile during the navy's first engagement on the Pacific. From 1815 to 1823 he served on the prestigeous Naval Board in Washington, but thereafter took to the sea again to fight piracy as Commanderin-Chief of the West Indian Squadron. In 1825, he was court-martialed under controversial circumstances after he had protected the honor of a junior officer by landing at Fajardo in Puerto Rico and seizing a fortress when the island was under Spanish rule. Porter, feeling humiliated by his enemies, had resigned from the U.S. Navy in 1826, had commanded the Mexican fleet for three years and then, under President Jackson, accepted a post as consul general in Algiers until that country was occupied by France. From there he had been reassigned Istanbul, a post which he took up in 1831 and occupied until his death a 1843.
Porter, who had formerly resided in Buyukdere on the Bosphorus when the other members of the diplomatic corps resided, had moved to a modes dwelling at San Stephens, a village on the Sea of Marmara twelve miles out from the city because of the shabby salary paid him by the U.S. government.
Reverend Dwight had commissioned three stalwart Turks and a sandal (rowboat) to take Stephens to Porter. Later Stephens got to know Porter even better because they met once again in Malta. Porter still spoke with bitterness over the Fajardo affair, but clearly it helped his ego to have had the support of General (later President) Jackson. Stephens, describing the family-style lunch shared with Porter and Dwight, made another of the observations which makes his travel account ring so authentically, "I cannot describe the satisfaction of these meetings of Americans so far from their own country. I have often experienced it most powerfully in the house of the missionaries in the East.... We had all the same habits and ways of thinking [and) their articles of furniture were [even) familiar to me...."
One final addition to the Istanbul setting, as sketched by Stephens, seems appropriate. As James A. Field, Jr. has so aptly emphasized in his book America and the Mediterranean World 1776-1882, the U.S. Navy and naval interests played a larger role in nineteenth century U.S. diplomacy than one might ordinarily imagine. After protracted negotiations, the United States in 1830 finally gained from the Turks diplomatic privileges, most-favored nation concessions and a promise of access to the Black Sea. What the Turks really wanted, in return, and indirectly received, was U.S. assistance in rebuilding their navy which had been destroyed by an Anglo-French fleet at Navarino Bay on 20 October, 1827. A secret clause of the treaty, promising naval assistance in rebuilding the Ottoman fleet, was struck down by Congress, but President Jackson proceeded to instruct Porter to render all necessary assistance. Hence Porter was able to gain Turkish ratification of the Treaty. As Field aptly observed, "A treaty sought for reasons of commerce had been gained for reasons of state, and the disparate interests of figs and opium, the gospel mission, and the great powers had led to what amounted, in fact if not in form, to an American naval mission to Turkey."
In 1835, Stephens was able to observe, at first hand, the results of the unwritten agreement. Charles Rhino, the negotiator of the treaty, had hoped for the appointment to Turkey as charge d'affaires. Failing in this endeavor because of President Jackson's personal tie with Commodore Porter, Rhind proceeded to help the Turks by enlisting the aid of his close friend, Henry Eckford, one of the foremost American ship designers and builders. Eckford had been the genius behind American naval superiority on the Great Lakes in the War of 1812. In 1830, he had a newly-designed warship for sale. Picking up references from President Jackson, he, together with Rhind, sailed for Turkey in his twenty-six gun corvette, the United States. The Sultan promptly bought the corvette and appointed Eckford to chief of his naval dockyards in the Golden Horn. When Eckford died suddenly in November, 1832, his shipwright foreman, Foster Rhodes, took control and completed a magnificent war vessel designed by Eckford. When Eckford's skills first became known to the Sultan, he was reported by Stephens to have said, "... America must be a great nation if she could spare from her service such a man."
Stephens had himself rowed up the Golden Horn where he chatted with Rhodes, who then stood at the head of the naval shipbuilding establishment of the Turks. Rhodes, a fellow New Yorker, spoke amiably of the excellent qualities of the ship he was completing for the Sultan while barking orders to his men which were immediately translated by his personal dragoman. At the launching, which Stephens had the good fortune of observing in the entourage of Porter, Stephens had all his glorious fantasies about the Sultan as 'Shadow of God on Earth' deflated when the Sultan's barge passed by," ... (the Sultan was seated in the bottom of a large caique, dressed in the military frock coat and red tarbouch, with his long black beard.... When he landed at the little dock, and his great officers bowed to the dust before him, he looked the plainest, mildest, kindest man among them." Fighting Turkish jealousy and fearing possible sabotage and also having to worry about the right confluence of the starts to please the official astronomers, Rhodes was quite worried about the launching, but in the end it went well ... " loud and long-continued shouts of applause rose with one accord from Turks and Christians, and the Sultan was so transported that he jumped up and clapped his hands like a school boy." After a subsequent trip to the slave market where a comely Circassian girl of eighteen beckoned Stephens to purchase her from her master for the equivalent of $250, Stephens took leave of Istanbul for the new Russian city of Odessa. Apparently after an extended stay, Stephens left the imperial city with a better opinion than he had held upon arrival. Istanbul still works this sort of magic on her visitors up to the present day.
The city as it would be experienced by the Hamlins possessed the same charm and the same disabilities that Stephens described. After ten days of rest in Izmir, together with the residing missionaries, Temple, Adger and Riggs, the Hamlins took passage on the steamer Stamboul. Hamlin, not unlike Stephens, comments upon the importance of steam navigation:
The Dardanelles were the gates of Constantinople. While northernly winds prevailed no sailing vessel could pass through, and often commerce had to wait weeks for wind. Steam made Constantinople a commercial city and brought the civilization, the arts, and the vices of the West and the East together in the Ottoman capital.
Spending the first inclement days indoors with the family of 'Father Goodell', Hamlin gives us some insight into the parlor games of the day, "... the Goodells, old and young, were longing for a game of blindman's bluff... but they were afraid it would shock our feelings of propriety."
Soon the Hamlins were welcomed by the Evangelical Union, at the time still a secret organization of Armenians who had renounced their Gregorian church to become Protestants. In contrast to the life of a bon vivant led by Stephens, the missionaries faced in 1839 the threat of expulsion and possible mob violence. In fact, the leading Ottoman member of the new group, John der Sahakian, was soon arrested at the prompting of the Armenian Patriarch and Hamlin's first daring deed for the mission was to hide Sahakian's correspondence and evangelical records from the Turkish gendarmerie. Typical of the missionaries everywhere, the Hamlins settled down to studying the local vernaculars, in this case, Armenian, Greek and French, the languages through which they would preach and hopefully gain converts. It was not long also until they moved into a 'commodious' house.
In the very unsettled but productive years between 1840 and 1850, the Istanbul missionaries had to face not only the suspicions of the Turks but also the outright hostility of the Armenian, Greek and Catholic religious bodies and the leverage against the Turks of their Euorpean backers, France, Italy and Russia. The Russians, in particular, saw the danger to their own interests of American missionary activity. But Hamlin was a newcomer and possessed of great energy and ability. He soon threw all of this trength into starting in 1840 a seminary in Bebek, a suburb of the city on the Bosphorus. In his words, "I thought the [mission] station too cautious and conservative, but they had experienced the powers of persecution to break up schools, and I had not."
As the seminary began to thrive, Hamlin noted, "Bebek Seminary had no small influence in the introduction of a purer style of speaking and writing the modern Armenian." -- and thus began the American influence on Armenian nationalism. Apart from being 'textbook to the students,' Hamlin set up a workshop in the stable, including a lathe, and he began to build most of what he needed to furnish the seminary. Soon Hamlin lowered his profile by adopting a beard and a fez in place of his stovepipe had and clean shaven face.
The future founder of Robert College included a number of fundamental observations in his memoir. As many of the Armenians were members of the craft guilds, they petitioned the Armenian patriarch (Catholicos) for lay representation on the ecclesiastical council. Clearly laymen on the Councils could have helped ease the pressure of the Armenian Church on the missionaries. Conversely, Russia often put pressure on the sarrafs (money changers an bankers), many of whom were Armenian, so that they would, in turn exert pressure on the Armenian patriarch and the Turkish government to eliminate the American 'heretics.' But clearly the Turks favored missionaries with shipbuilding compatriots!
In 1843 an Armenian by the name of Hovakian, who had earlier become a convert to Islam, apostasized and was thus, according to custom, beheaded. Stratford de Redcliffe, the powerful British Ambassador, made a major issue of this outrage. He proved that no passage in the Quran supported this barbarity and forced the Sultan to swear that death for apostasy would henceforth be outlawed in the empire. This incident elicited Hamlin's harshest criticism of Islam: 'Death for apostasy is inherent in the faith. Polygamy, concubinage, slavery, divorce, death penalty -- all go together in the social and civil life of Islam.' A Muslim might well agree to this criticism but would be quick to point out the existence of these social abuses in the hypocritical West!
Hamlin was always a tenacious adversary even as his Bowdoin classmates had earlier learned. When attacked in local pamphlets by the Jesuits, Hamlin produced in Armenian a powerful rebuttal of Roman Catholicism entitled Papists and Protestants. Even hardline Armenians of Gregorian persuasion thanked the mission for its help in checking the Jesuits who also were making converts among the Armenians. During the forties, Hamlin also expended much energy producing translations of American school texts for the Armenian mission schools. In particular Hamlin's adaptation into Armeno-Turkish (Turkish in Armenian script) of a mathematics book attracted the attention of the Minister of Public Instruction, Ahmed Vefik Pasha, a distinguished Ottoman statesman and scholar, who had it rendered into the Turkish script and distributed in the Turkish schools.
Cyrus Hamlin represents the missionaries of a transitional type. By introducing industrial arts into the curriculum of his seminary, against the wishes of many of his mission colleagues, he enabled the new converts to survive. In 1846, the Armenian patriarch declared an anathema against all Protestant Armenians and those who aided them. Hamlin, taking advice from a group of English engineers who the Sultan had hired to set up a governmental woolen mill, printing works and machine shop in Makrikoy, enlarged his own workshop so that his students could earn enough money to pay their fees. With this modest beginning, the students were able to make clothing, stoves and rat traps which were bought by the general public.
But clearly Hamlin required a much larger employment enterprise if he were to break the boycott against Protestant Armenian workers. The Crimean War (1853-56) provided the opportunity. Just prior to the war, Hamlin had discovered that each millet (religious community) had been accorded the right, by Sultan Mehmed II, the conqueror of Istanbul, to mill its own flour and bake its own bread. Thanks to the intervention of Stratford de Redcliffe, the British Ambassador, the Sultan had officially recognized the Protestant Millet in 1850. Leaving aside for a moment the implications for American missionaries of accepting British imperial support for their activities, Hamlin now had the legal support he required to overcome the opposition of the Istanbul millers' and bakers' guilds. Next Hamlin imported the parts necessary to assemble a steam engine for power to turn the millstones. With yeast from the German brewery and an abundance of grain from many parts of the Empire, Hamlin now launched his bakery. Owing to the high quality of the product, the enterprise grew rapidly and thus a number of unemployed Protestant Armenians immediately found work. Upon the outbreak of the war, Hamlin and his crew often supplied as much as 6,000 pounds of bread per day to the Selimiye barracks which was converted into a military hospital and eventually came under the able administration of Florence Nightingale. With the profits, the mission was able to build a number of new churches. During the war also, a number of seminarians served as interpreters on the front, and two other ancillary businesses, coffee grinding and a laundry for the hospital, were also generated by Hamlin. Needless to mention, the boycott of the converts was effectively broken.
Hamlin had exhausted himself with these activities and in 1855 took home leave giving a number of lectures in the United States and England. Taking stock of the mission accomplishments, Hamlin listed four major ones:
I- the furthering of religious freedom and the founding of 35
churches;
2- reform or transformation of education in the East;
3- the successful use of the press for Biblical and educational tracts;
4- the fostering of a number of sound industries which helped support the
new flock.
One might also add that Hamlin had demonstrated the importance of responsible leadership and entrepreneurial activity to his charges, in short, Yankee know-how.
After a number of years meditating about the significance of the Crimean War, Hamlin came to the conclusion that Louis Napoleon and the French government had made it impossible for Britain to cripple Russia permanently, a cause Hamlin obviously felt worthwhile. He believed, however, that certain positive values prevailed in the Ottoman Empire following the announcement of the Hatt-i Humayun or imperial decree of reform of 1856. It marked the beginning of religious and civil liberty in Turkey and the end of serfdom in European Turkey; and it reduced the power of the Christian religious hierarchies, weakened the guilds and checked Russia; in other words, the War reduced the power of Hamlin's adversaries in the faith! Hamlin greatly regretted the removal of Stratford de Redcliffe and his replacement by Henry Bulwer, whom Hamlin considered immoral. Hamlin's animosity stemmed from the fee (bribe) of $50,000 allegedly paid to Bulwer by Khedive Ismail (1863-75) of Egypt. 'Ali Pasha, the Grand Vezir, agreed to settle the dispute if Sir Henry dropped British meddling in Bulgaria, Serbia, and the American College problem. It is during this period of intense negotiations in the 1860's for the right to build Robert College that 'Ali Pasha is supposed to have remarked, "Will this Mr. Hamlin never die and let me alone on the college question?"
On leave, Hamlin had met in Paris, Christopher Rhinelander Robert, a wealthy American businessman- philanthropist, but no mention of the college surfaced at the time. Robert had made a fortune chiefly in the importation of sugar, cotton and tea. A religious man, he had served the American Home Missionary Society. James and Wiliam Dwight, sons of the Istanbul missionary, H.G.O. Dwight, had suggested the idea to Robert of founding an American-style college in Istanbul. Robert subsequently visited the Bebek Seminary of Hamlin in 1856, presumably while Hamlin was on leave.
Meanwhile the American Board under the leadership of Rufus Anderson had taken two steps which alienated Hamlin. It was decided that the Seminary would be moved to Merzifon. Secondly, only vernacular instruction would henceforth be given and the strong emphasis Hamlin had placed on industrial arts would be phased out. It is thus not surprising that Hamlin enthusiastically welcomed Robert's proposal about founding a secular college with instruction in English.
The confluence of several events made the college, named after Robert, its first benefactor, a success: a) Robert's 'seed' money; b) the skill and experience of Hamlin; c) the rivalry between the learned Ahmed Vefik Pasha and 'Ali Pasha, the Grand Vezir; d) the support of the British, particularly of Lord Ashley, seventh Earl of Shaftesbury, noted for his support of British social reform and his presidency of the British and Foreign Bible Society (Shaftesbury was also the stepson-in-law of Palmerston), and finally, e) a boost from the U.S. Navy. Hamlin resigned from the mission in 1860 and put all his efforts into getting the college started in spite of the approaching Civil War in the United States. Robert's initial donation became much depreciated in the international market thus Hamlin sought funds in Britain with the aid of Shaftesbury. Much to Hamlin's surprise, given British feelings about slavery, the British generally supported the South against the Union, as one gentleman stated, "... We think the great republic is too big already! Let it be separated into two republics. They will watch each other and Europe will feel greatly relieved!" In the United States, from 1860 to 1861, Hamlin received little aid from the American 'can Board and Congregational churches in his money-raising efforts. Harvard College liege, however, helped and with the aid of British contributions, Hamlin open the college in 1863 on the site of the former seminary; hence he needed no new school permit application for which his cultural enemies would have blocked. Meanwhile he had bought an ideal site for the college from Ahmed Vefik Pasha on the heights above Bebek. The Pasha had quarreled with the Grand Vezir, 'Ali Pasha, over embassy allowances while serving as Turkish ambassador in France. Both to spite 'Ali Pasha and to pay off his debts, he sold a choice site to Hamlin. Immediately Abbe Bore, head of the Jesuit mission, the Catholic embassies and Imperial Russia opposed an application for a building permit.
Midhat Pasha, a well-known liberal, served as Grand Vezir for a short time in late 1867 and early 1868 and viewed with favor the American project, but Hamlin somehow had first to overcome the opposition of the powerful Ottoman bureaucracy. Fortunately for Robert College, Admiral David Farragut, America's first full admiral and the hero of a number of engagements during the Civil War, had assumed command of the United States squadron in Europe and as a part of his tour of duty, he made a courtesy call ('showed the flag') in Istanbul. Farragut was no stranger to the Mediterranean. His father, a Spaniard from Minorca, had joined the United States navy as a young man when the Mediterranean squadron still wintered at Port Mahon. Upon his father's early death, Farragut had been adopted by Commodore Porter. As a young officer of 20 years old, he had served as attache in Tunis and had learned a great deal of Arabic and French. In his visit to Istanbul on the Franklin in August of 1868, he was given special permission to pass the Dardanelles and was received by both Sultan 'Abd ul-'Aziz and Khedive Ismail who was then visiting his overlord. Hamlin explained to the Admiral the plight of the building permit for the college and the Admiral discretely raised the question with his military counterparts in the Turkish armed United forces. Meanwhile, possibly unknown to Hamlin, there had been rumors that the United States was seeking a new Mediterranean naval base and many felt that this subject was the Admiral's 'secret' mission. The visit corresponded with a bitter revolt against Turkish rule on the island of Crete, and the Turks naturally feared that the United States might declare a protectorate over Crete and set up a naval base there. Choosing the lesser of two evils, 'Ali Pasha suddenly gained the Sultan's irade or imperial decree giving permission for Robert College to build on the site proposed.
Thus, Hamlin, by means of a quite devious and unpremeditated event, had overcome the greatest obstacle to providing a proper setting for his college. He personally supervised the construction of the first building fashioned out of stone quarried right on the college grounds. The new qualm were ready for occupancy in the spring of 1871 and Secretary Seward, recently retired from the State Department, gave the official opening address on July 4, 1872. The Muslims and native Christians at first viewed the college with suspicion as another missionary school in Istanbul, hence Hamlin recruited a number of students from the Balkans during the early years of the school's existence. Indeed Hamlin continued to emphasize Biblical moral training, liberal arts and also industrial arts, which can be considered the origin of the later famous Robert College School of Engineering. But Hamlin's days as College head were numbered. He fell out with his benefactor, Robert, and the school in 1877 passed under the control of his son-in-law, George Washburn, a man more in tune with the times, who built up a liberal arts curriculum on the New England college model and staffed the college with young Americans. Thus the College in 1877 began to adopt the liberal arts format which has made the college one of the finest contributors to Turkey, the Middle East and the Balkans of the American Enlightenment and liberal tradition.
2. Daniel Bliss and the Origins of the American University of Beirut
The similarity between the early life of Cyrus Hamlin and of Daniel Bliss is striking. Bliss began his life on 17 August, 1823 in Georgia, Vermont. He lost his mother at age nine and his father moved him and the younger children of his family to Madison, Ohio in 1836. At age 16 he was forced to leave home and relatives because they could no longer afford to feed him. Until then his burning desire to attend school had been continually thwarted. After hiring himself out to various families as an 'extra hand' he eventually became apprenticed to a tanner and achieved enough proficiency in the trade to join a partnership in a tannery in Geneva, Ohio. In 1846, having accumulated some funds in the tannery business, Bliss enrolled at the age of 23 in the Kingsville Academy to study Algebra, Greek and Latin in preparation for college. Bliss soon made his mark as a ' born teacher' and was able to teach elementary subjects in the same school in which he studied. Two years later, in 1848, he entered Amherst College! With defective preparation and the need to earn every cent of his college expenses young Bliss had little time for pleasantries. (He noted, however, that his food bill for the first term was $8.26!) Older and more settled in his goals, he did manage to court Miss Abbey Wood, a local girl 'of good family' who knew Emily Dickinson, also from Amherst, as a playmate.
From Amherst, Bliss attended Andover Seminary in Cambridge, Massachusetts and married Miss Wood upon graduation in 1855. George Washburn, the future son-in-law of Cyrus Hamlin and second president of Robert College, had been a freshman at Amherst when Bliss was a senior. Hence Amherst became the model for both Syrian Protestant College and Robert College. The founders of Amherst envisioned as a goal for its graduates, "the civilizing and evangelizing of the world." The college was not disappointed by the activities of these two lifelong friends. Julius Seelye, later to become president of Amherst, also contributed sons and grandsons to service in the Middle East.
The newlyweds sailed for Smyrna on 12 December, 1855 in the Sultana and arrived on 22 January, 1856. Mrs. Bliss did not find Smyrna as attractive as had Stephens some twenty years earlier, but then she had little standard for comparison: "Smyrna is a very disagreeable city, The streets are so narrow that if you meet a camel or a donkey you must dodge into a niche in the wall or doorway while they pass... such mud and filth I never dreamed of .... The missionaries in Smyrna employ Greek men to do their cooking and work. So we had some of the native dishes..." But Beirut struck her fancy as is apparent from another letter; Beirut from the vessel (a French steamer) was perfectly enchanting.... The streets of the city are much wider and cleaner than in Smyrna. The missionaries live outside the city walls among beautiful gardens.... We sat down to a real New England breakfast of slap-jacks which seemed so good after our French cookery."
Pliny Fiske of the Mission Board had first visited Beirut in mid- 1823 and the station was opened in November by Isaac Bird and Eli Smith. Here too the hazards of converting Muslims was quickly realized. The missionaries thus concentrated their attention on members of the principal Christian churches of Syria and Palestine, the Maronite, the Greek Orthodox (Melkite), the GreekCatholic (Uniate), and the Armenian.
Considering Syria and Lebanon as one geographic unit an authoritative observer has recently estimated that "... the Maronites and Melkites make up one-fourth to one-third of the Syrian population." The Maronites, had been long associated with Mount Lebanon, and had been under papal authority since the sixteenth century and French protection since the seventeenth century, and hence felt a strong attachment to Mount Lebanon, their faith and to the West. Within the Ottoman Empire their status fluctuated from era to era but, generally speaking, they had managed a precarious autonomous existence. The Melkites (Greek Orthodox Arabs), by contrast, were greatly diffused throughout Syrian society but had preserved their community and faith through the strength of Byzantine tradition and their commercial services to-the Muslim city dwellers. A schism had occured among the Melkites, and Greek Catholics had taken refuge on Mount Lebanon. They too shared a split tradition, partly of the West, partly of the East.
A number of the Protestant predecessors of Bliss had come to Lebanon and Syria during the Egyptian occupation when the first phase of Maronite nationalism and the revival of Arab literature had started. The power of the Ottomans and Ottoman-oriented local rulers had been shattered by the armies and the occupation of Ibrahim Pasha, son of Muhammad 'Ali, in the years 1831 to1840. In this brief decade, Ibrahim Pasha had introduced a number of enlightened measures benefitting the non-Muslim communities. Unfortunately, as usually is the case, when the Egyptian occupation was forced out by the Western powers, the local Muslims took out their vengeance on those Christians and Jews they considered had cooperated too closely with Egypt. But even after the Ottomans returned, the old power relationships were not easily reestablished because in1839 the Ottomans themselves had officially launched an era of Westernizing reform, known as the Tanzimat.
Lebanon, again under Ottoman ruler after the Egyptian withdrawal, remained, as before, divided between a Druze Emir of the Arstan family in the south and a Maronite Emir of the Bellama' family in the north.29 But the latent nationalism of the Maronite bishop-emirs gave rise to three attempts by the Maronites in 1839, 1845 and 1860 to acquire some of the feudal lands controlled by the Druzes. These unjustified attacks by the Maronites on their neighbors sparked two reactions, the massacre of a number of Christians in 1860-61 and the intervention of French and British troops and ships, incidents of which are described in the Bliss memoir. Eventually this intervention led to the Reglement organique, a virtual constitution for Mount Lebanon, which made it an autonomous Maronite province under an Ottoman Christian governor whose seat was at Ba'abda. In addition, the Ottomans provided another governor for the rest of Lebanon who resided in Beirut and looked after the interests of the Muslims and other residents of the province.
The Arabic literary revival among Christian Arabs, in its ecclesiastical and historical aspects, reached back into the eighteenth century. By the mid-nineteenth century, in view of the Christian-Muslim communal strife, which had become more destructive and bitter with the developing symbiotic relationship between Western, European trader and Christian Arab local agents, certain Christian Arab intellectuals began to channel their intellectual energies into developing a broader-based secular nationalism under which Muslim and Christian could unite on the basis of merit, not religion. The newly ensconced American missionaries indirectly lent support to a secularist movement by giving employment and enlarging the horizons of two budding literary figures of mid-nineteenth century Beirut, the Uniate Melkite Nasif al-Yaziji (1800-1871) and Butrus al-Bustani (1819-1882), a Maronite convert to Protestantism. Both of these men played an important initial roll for the American missionary movement by assisting in the translation of the Bible into Syrian Arabic. AlBustani, an early convert to Protestantism, served as one of the vital sparks of the local Arab Protestant church, which came under the protection of the Protestant millet, declared by the Sultan in 1850 upon the insistence of Britain. Much to the discredit of the Protestant Mission Board and probably to the cause of the American missionaries in general, Bustani's petition to be ordained as a minister in 1854 was turned down. Not until the 1870's did the Americans abandon this short-sighted policy of ethnic superiority. Bustani immediately resigned from his church duties, but then turned to a brilliant career in lexicography, encyclopedia compilation and journalism.
One other aspect of relations between American protestant missionaries and local Christians bears mentioning. Since the sixteenth century, the French monarchy, with some notable exceptions, had stood closely with the Ottoman sultans against Habsburg Austria and Spain. Thus, French consuls and merchants had long enjoyed privileges in the Levant greater even than the British. It is natural to expect that, as co-religionists of the French, the Maronites and later the Uniate Melkites, were accorded a number of special commercial privileges and French protection against corsairs, privileges not enjoyed by the Muslims and non-Uniate oriental Christians. The results of this type of French favoritism were at least twofold: a) the animosity and jealousy of the Muslims and other oriental Christians were aroused, and b) because of nominal French allegiance to the Pope, the according of economic privilege brought a number of converts over to Uniate or Maronite persuasion. Early during his tenure in Istanbul Cyrus Hamlin was forced to make the connection between conversion to Protestant Christianity, the granting of diplomatic protection (accorded to the Americans largely by the British, not the United States) and financial independence of the Rock from patriarchal control.
In Lebanon, the French were deeply entrenched. This condition was important because American trade and diplomatic muscle had not preceded the missionaries. There was also another obstacle: Protestant Christianity was much more theologically demanding than had been the Uniate Roman Church. In most respects, Rome had left alone the practices of the oriental churches, only asking the clergy to accept the authority of the Pope, but the Protestant missionaries demanded nothing less than accepting a new personal relationship to God and His revealed Scriptures. Conversion came slower in Lebanon and Syria because of spiritual, economic and diplomatic factors. It is not surprising that many of the early converts to Protestantism had obtained employment as teachers or helpers in the mission schools, clinics and churches, both in Turkey and the Arab lands.
Into this turbulent political and cultural ferment stepped Daniel Bliss and his frail wife. Shortly after their arrival, in 1856, a fellow missionary recorded this 'happy thought' in his diary: "The Blisses have arrived. Mrs. Bliss will not five a year and Mr. Bliss is not a practical man."
They took up residence initially in Abeih in order to study Arabic where Dr. Van Dyck had founded a high school and seminary in 1843. The Abeih school served as the foundation for the later Arab Protestant College. In keeping with new American Board directives aimed at putting missionaries into the field sooner and gaining more 'souls,' the Blisses in 1858 were given their 'station' at Suq al-Gharb, where they supervised a girls' boarding school.
It was not long, however, before the communal strife between Maronite and Druze broke out all around the Blisses in their exposed mountain village. In 1860 they withdrew into Beirut to the protection of the English and French forces, but with the arrival of an Anglo-American relief effort, Bliss was soon distributing food and clothing to a number of villages. Eventually Bliss suggested that the villagers be given work and wages rather than handouts; thus, in 1861, Bliss supervised the widening of a section of a road between Kafr Shima and Dair al-Omar.
By 1861, the difficulties of sending Lebanese or Syrian young men abroad for higher education had become apparent. Also, it was clear the Abeih School was inadequate for the newly developing political and religious opportunities. At the mission meeting of January 23, 1862, it was proposed that a college be established and that Daniel Bliss become its first president. About this time also, Reverend Bliss had made the acquaintance of a young graduate of Yale, D. Stuart Dodge, who greeted the idea of a college in Beirut with great enthusiasm. Young Dodge was the son of William E. Dodge, one of the wealthy founders (in 1833) of Phelps. Dodge, a devout Christian, helped his son and Daniel Bliss, who returned to the United States in 1862, to set up a Board of Trustees in the year 1863. Thus, Dodge and his friends became the benefactors of Syrian Protestant College much as Christopher Robert had served Hamlin and the cause of Robert College. Representatives of the Arab Christian and the European communities of Beirut supported the college idea enthusiastically, but understanding the deepseated local animosities, preferred foreign control of such a venture. Here we have a sharp contrast between the Ottoman attitude about a foreign college in their own capital and a college to be set up in an essentially distant and troublesome Ottoman provincial town.
Bliss had greater success raising funds in the wartime United States than did Cyrus Hamlin, but this fact was probably conditioned by the influence of Dodge. The sum of $100,000, which Bliss raised between 1862 and 1864, had become grossly depreciated overseas during the Civil War so that Bliss also resorted to raising funds in Britain for a year and a half, 1864 to 1866. Again, as in the case of Robert College, with the aid of Shaftesbury and de Redcliffe, he raised 6,000 pounds sterling.
The Bliss returned to Beirut in 1866 to open the college. Young D. Stuart Dodge accompanied them to serve as professor of modem languages. The curriculum was designed to prepare ministers, lawyers, physicians, engineers and businessmen. One of the interesting details which both Robert College and Syrian Protestant College shared was their chartering process. Both institutions, under the legal guidance of Samuel J. Tilden, a prominent lawyer and later presidential candidate, were chartered as corporations in the State of New York on May 14, 1864. Daniel Bliss later noted, "These two institutions are thus not only sisters but twins."
The college opened with sixteen students and a faculty of eight. Syrian College differed from Robert in that until about 1880, instruction was in Arabic instead of English. Two leading Christian Arabists, Butrus al-Bustani and Nasif al-Yaziji, who made great contributions to the renewal of the Arabic language and to the intellectual fife of the 'Arab Awakening', brought their high standards to the study of Arabic at Syrian Protestant College. In 1867 soon after the college opened its doors, the world-renowned medical school got its start.
Bliss had looked over dozens of prospective building sites for a permanent
college campus and finally bought quietly the present site of American
University of Beirut in 1870. Shortly thereafter, Bliss obtained Ottoman
permission to build on the site. William E. Dodge, the original benefactor,
appropriately laid the cornerstone of the first building on December 8,
1871. Many individuals contributed their skills and their largess to the
founding of Robert College and Syrian Protestant College (to be named the
American University of Beirut in 1920, corresponding to more secular trends).
It is also clear that the high intellectual and moral standards of the
first missionary presidents of these two institutions, Cyrus Hamlin and
Daniel Bliss, imparted a quality of seriousness of purpose to these American
colleges which persisted deep into the twentieth century. The importance
of these efforts in establishing an organic cultural link between the peoples
of the United States and the peoples of the Middle East, while appreciated
by both peoples for some 100 years, is, unfortunately, in our own day,
no longer understood or appreciated by large numbers of both societies.