Study Guide for Murphey and Bacque-Grammont essays on Suleyman's Eastern
Policy
Rhoads Murphey studied with the same person I studied with at Columbia
University, Tibor Halasi-Kun, taught once here at Michigan State, and now
is on the faculty at the University of Birmingham in England. Jean-Louis
Bacque-Grammont served as direct or of the French Institute in Istanbul
and now is at the Sorbonne in Paris. Their two essays were presented at
a conference at Princeton University on Suleyman. Suleyman of course ruled
for 46 years, a long time, and thus there is plenty of chronological room
for two accounts of his eastern policy. Bacque-Grammont focuses on the
early period; Murphey on the later period. But each also has a quite different
view of general Ottoman policy towards Iran and vice versa.
How do their views differ?
What were the real motives behind Ottoman policy towards Iran? religious?
political?